I doubt he is the first person to do this... just the first to be slandered on social media for it. I get it, he wanted something that his child did as undying artwork. I know a lot of people who have pictures tattooed on themselves that their children drew. The only difference is that he let the child hold the needle and do it first hand. He guided the child, he was there for safety precautions I'm sure he did everything in a clean fashion, the little girl was wearing gloves so his blood didn't get on her. What's the big deal honestly? If people can take their children to shoot guns which to some people promotes violence and can actually be life threatening if an accident occurred why can she give a small supervised tattoo? How is this child abuse? He is not abusing her, child abuse would be if he was holding HER down and giving her the tattoo.