Up Your Cupcake
Please 'Register' or 'Log-in' to start interacting with the forum.

Up Your Cupcake

Connect with other women from all over the world! Share advice, get support, & make lifelong friendships.
 
HomePortalRegisterLog in
Log in
Username:
Password:
Log in automatically: 
:: I forgot my password
Navigation
Portal
Forum
Memberlist
User Control Panel
Forum FAQ

August 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031   
CalendarCalendar
Tweet With Us ♥
Poll
What is your opinion on Male Infant Circumcision?
 Pro-Circumcision
 Pro-Parents Choice
 Anti-Circumcision
 I don't have an opinion.
View results

Share | .
 

 It's time to end inaccurate criticisms of male circumcision

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
avatar
SnarkyCupcake
Administrator
Administrator


PostSubject: It's time to end inaccurate criticisms of male circumcision   Wed Dec 10, 2014 10:18 pm

http://www.latimes.com/opinion/opinion-la/la-ol-circumcision-20141209-story.html wrote:




The recent report by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention should quell the unfounded arguments that male circumcision is no better than or different from female circumcision, also known as female genital mutilation. According to the draft guidelines released by the CDC, the benefits of male circumcisionclearly outweigh the risks, in the form of reduced risks of urinary tract infection as infants and penile cancer later in life, and lower risk of contracting HIV and other sexually transmitted diseases.

It’s understandable that circumcision has become controversial. It’s a permanent change made to the body, usually in infancy. (It should be noted that parents make all kinds of decisions that affect their children’s lives permanently; circumcision happens to be a particularly visible one.) At least, foes of circumcision say, the procedure should be delayed until the boy grows old enough to make his own decision. That argument, along with some unsuccessful local efforts to ban circumcision within certain cities, conflicts with the beliefs of Jews and Muslims, whose religions call for male circumcision early in life. There is some evidence that the procedure is easier to recover from when done early in life — but it’s also true that most of the benefits are accrued later in life.

The CDC report won’t end the debate, nor should it necessarily do so. Perhaps its most important short-term good will be to increase the likelihood that the procedure will be covered by health insurance, because circumcision could not be viewed as solely a cosmetic procedure, but rather one that carried health benefits backed by the most current scientific research. That gives parents the option -- either way.

Of course, even religious traditions shouldn’t outweigh health concerns. Just as female genital mutilation is outlawed in this country no matter what the religious beliefs of the parents, if the CDC report had found similar complications with male circumcision, then there should be serious conversations about whether the procedure should be allowed. But that’s not what the science shows; until there is solid evidence to contradict the CDC report, conversations about restricting parents’ ability to make this decision for their sons should end.


THOUGHTS?
Back to top Go down
 

It's time to end inaccurate criticisms of male circumcision

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Up Your Cupcake :: HOT TOPICS & E-DISCUSSIONS ♥ :: Parents vs. Attacktivists-