Up Your Cupcake
Please 'Register' or 'Log-in' to start interacting with the forum.

Up Your Cupcake

Connect with other women from all over the world! Share advice, get support, & make lifelong friendships.
 
HomePortalRegisterLog in
Log in
Username:
Password:
Log in automatically: 
:: I forgot my password
Navigation
Portal
Forum
Memberlist
User Control Panel
Forum FAQ

October 2017
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
3031     
CalendarCalendar
Tweet With Us ♥
Poll
What is your opinion on Male Infant Circumcision?
 Pro-Circumcision
 Pro-Parents Choice
 Anti-Circumcision
 I don't have an opinion.
View results

Share | .
 

 National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
AuthorMessage
avatar
SnarkyCupcake
Administrator
Administrator


PostSubject: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Thu Oct 02, 2014 1:06 pm

http://rhrealitycheck.org/article/2014/09/30/national-review-writer-calls-hanging-women-abortions/[/mention] wrote:


At least one in three women in the United States will have at least one abortion in her lifetime.
Six in ten American women who have an abortion already have a child, and more than three in ten already have two or more children.

Studies find that women of all religious faiths and traditions, all political affiliations, and all races, classes, and backgrounds have abortions. It is one of the most common and safestsurgical procedures in the United States. And these women—women like me, and like countless daughters, mothers, sisters, friends, nieces, and cousins—have abortions for a wide variety of reasons, ranging from their own judgment about whether and when they can afford to have a child (or another child), to experiences of violence and violation, to matters of life and death, to “none of your business.”
A columnist for the National Review believes we should all be hanged.

This weekend, Kevin Williamson, whose Twitter bio describes him as a “roving reporter for the National Review,” declared on Twitter that all abortions should be treated as premeditated homicide, and that women who have had abortions should face capital punishment, namely hanging. No exceptions.


He did not go so far as to describe in what venues these hangings should take place, but it might be fair to assume that Williamson has in mind public executions, so that other women are made very, very sure of their place in society—which is to say, subservient.

Reading several of Williamson’s columns, I see a man who desperately wants to be taken seriously. His pieces are full of pseudo-intellectual musings and plenty of Very Big Words, in a transparent attempt to prove how smart he is. In a recent piece on Lena Dunham and voting, he reveals deep condescension for women, voters, and anyone who is not (according to his judgment) as smart as himself. Voting, Williamson writes, “is the most shallow gesture of citizenship there is.”

That piece is titled “Five Reasons You Are Too Stupid To Vote.” Williamson offers only one reason. Did he forget the other four?

We should perhaps be thankful that, in another tweet, Williamson stated, “I don’t vote.”

In a piece on abortion and capital punishment, he notes that a “consistent life ethic” requires opposition to capital punishment, though he admits to finding reasons capital punishment should still be carried out. Tweeting this weekend, he said, “I’m torn on capital punishment generally; but treating abortion as homicide means what it means.” He further said, “I am against abortion per se in all circumstances.” In other words, he claims a “consistent life ethic,” which would mean he is against capital punishment per se but believes there are circumstances in which capital punishment should be employed anyway. Yet when women’s lives, health, or well-being are threatened, he sees no exceptions for abortion care. Rather, his answer when it comes to women and abortion is to promote capital punishment for them.


In an ongoing Twitter exchange, I asked Williamson if he knew women who had had abortions. He said yes. I asked him if he had told them he thought they should be hanged. No answer. I asked again. No answer. I asked if he would tell the women in his circle who’ve had abortions that he believes they committed homicide. No answer. I asked Williamson if, being consistent and applying the laws he supports to his own family, he would allow his wife to die in a circumstance in which her life were imminently threatened by a pregnancy rather than break his no exceptions rule. He would not answer. I asked if his wife opted for an abortion in a given circumstance, including to save her own life, would he report her to the authorities. Again, no answer. The only reply I got was him calling my line of questioning an “elementary-school trolley problem gambit.”

“Go look it up if you don’t understand,” he added.

In short, he gave no answer when asked to apply his legal proposal to his own family. He refused to take responsibility for the laws and policies he espouses.

Pregnancy, however, is not an elementary school “trolley problem.” It is real life. Pregnancy, labor, delivery, childbirth, child spacing, child-rearing, and feeding, clothing, raising, emotionally investing in, and in all ways caring for children from birth throughout their lives are all real-life issues.

Sometimes pregnancy, childbirth, and delivery result in the death or illness of women. These are not theoretical “trolley problems.” They are real. They are practical. They involve tradeoffs. I know this, as I am a mother and a woman who has had an abortion. And I understand that every time a woman faces a pregnancy—intended or unintended, healthy or untenable—she faces a set of circumstances unique to that pregnancy and that moment in her life.

Williamson’s answers therefore reveal exactly the problem with his pseudo-academic approach, and that of the anti-choice movement writ large, to the issues women face in sex, pregnancy, childbirth, and the lifelong commitment to other human beings that is involved in being a parent. He and they are bereft of compassion and understanding for the real circumstances of real women. They lack respect for the intellectual and emotional maturity and responsibility real women take as they make rational decisions about either abortion or childbirth when facing unintended pregnancy. In other words, they do not trust women as moral agents to make choices that are best for them and their families. Anti-choicers like Williamson lack understanding of or just simply deny immutable facts of public health, such as the fact that access to safe abortion care is directly correlated to improved health outcomes for women, infants, and children. He is either unaware of or irresponsibly ignores the fact that in many states in this country women are today being arrested for miscarriage and pregnancy loss on the basis of “suspected abortion.” His answers and his body of work reveal a dangerous mixture of misogyny and disgust for women, a wholesale lack of compassion, an inability to face reality, and complete ignorance of public health, medical, biological, and human rights evidence.

And, tellingly, he is unwilling to apply his own rules to his own family.
Back to top Go down
avatar
Freebird
VIP
VIP


PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:15 pm

Oh for fucksakes, shut that mutherfucker up! I HATE abortion, I think it is an awful decision to have to make and I believe that most women who make that choice are very torn up about it. As much as I hate the act I do not have hatred or ill will in my heart for those who make this choice. Your body, your conscience, your choice and I will always support a womans right to choose.
Back to top Go down
avatar
DaBitch
VIP
VIP


PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:19 pm

WTF, is this guy for real, its up too a woman, it is her choice. I wouldnt have an abortion, cause I believe its a life in me. But I wont go against a woman and call her murder for doing it either. Just going too far saying they should be hung for it . x
Back to top Go down
avatar
Guest
Guest


PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Thu Oct 02, 2014 3:25 pm

He's just looking for attention/his 15 minutes. I just try to ignore these people. I'm pro life myself but would never suggest going to these extremes!
Back to top Go down
avatar
Guest
Guest


PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Thu Oct 02, 2014 9:52 pm

MissDeb wrote:
He's just looking for attention/his 15 minutes. I just try to ignore these people. I'm pro life myself but would never suggest going to these extremes!

I agree with you Deb!

I am pro-life but would never in a million years suggest any kind of punishment for those who do chose abortion. In the end, just like with birthing choices, your body your choice.....whether or not I like it. This guy is an ass hat
Back to top Go down
avatar
epiod
Administrator
Administrator


PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   Fri Oct 03, 2014 7:31 am

I feel that ignorant people should be subjected to public hangings.... He seems to fit that bill. (sarcasm)
Back to top Go down

Sponsored content



PostSubject: Re: National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions   

Back to top Go down
 

National Review Writer Calls for Hanging Women Who Have Abortions

View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 1 of 1

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Up Your Cupcake :: HOT TOPICS & E-DISCUSSIONS ♥ :: Parents vs. Attacktivists-